Legal Opinion
Mattice v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1955PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Upon this appeal the defendant relies upon language in the case of Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc., 222 Wis. 553, 269 N. W. 309, wherein this court said (pp. 560, 561) :
“Three elements are necessary to establish apparent agency: (1) Acts by the agent or principal justifying belief in the agency. (2) Knowledge thereof by the party sought to be held (in the present case, appellant). (3) Reliance thereon by the plaintiff, consistent with ordinary care and prudence. Domasek v. Kluck, 113 Wis. 336, 339, 89 N. W. 139. . . .
“The apparent authority for which the principal may be liable must be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDermott v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Voell v. KleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Domasek v. KluckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lamb v. General Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Smith v. OsbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Everlite Manufacturing Co. v. Grand Valley MacHine & Tool Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Grummitt v. Sturgeon Bay Winter Sports ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961
- DEBELAK BROS., INC. v. MilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.