Legal Opinion

Gene Peters v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 12, 1982No. 201-78PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

The issues in this case, on appeal from the United States Claims Court, * are (1) whether a written modification of a government timber sale contract, by which the contractor agreed to increase the contract price for the timber in return for authority to use a cheaper logging method than the contract specified, was valid; and (2) if valid, whether the modification properly was applied to cover timber cut and removed prior to the modification. In his recommended decision, Trial Judge Yock of the United States Court of Claims upheld the modification, but gave it only…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Everett Plywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. United States v. Corliss Steam-Engine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  3. McLain Plumbing & Electrical Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Reservation Ranch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API