Legal Opinion

Reservation Ranch v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 22, 1997No. 94-403CPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge.

Plaintiff Reservation Ranch seeks $5,500,-000.00 from the United States for the cancellation of its timber sale contract. The U.S. Forest Service (“Forest Service”) canceled that contract pursuant to a contract provision permitting cancellation and limiting compensation should the Chief of the Forest Service (“Chief’) determine that harvesting the sale would be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species, or cause an adverse impact to a sensitive species. This matter is now before the court following oral argument on cross-motions for…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. First Heights Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Scott Timber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Wetsel-Oviatt Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Tesoro Hawaii Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API