Redmond v. Peterson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgments. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Appeal from a judgment against said incompetent, Hannah J. Peterson, in favor of the plaintiff, and from a judgment in favor of the defendant Liberty S. Henderyckx, as executor of R. S. Henderyckx, upon his cross-complaint, against said Peterson, and also from an order denying the motion of said Peterson, by her guardian, to set aside said judgments.
The action was brought by the plaintiff to foreclose a mortgage executed by R. S. Henderyckx (since deceased) to Hannah J. Peterson, to secure a promissory note made by the mortgagor to the mortgagee, and which *597note and mortgage were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Gray v. Palmer & EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Smith v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Johnston v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- McCloskey v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by14 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Happel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Bank of America v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fresno Estate Co. v. FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.