Legal Opinion

State v. All Real Property, Residence & Appurtenances

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2005No. 20040734PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 In this case, we must determine whether Bruce Petersen is barred from raising a defense based on insufficient service of a complaint. Both the district court and the court of appeals determined that Petersen waived the right to raise that defense in his second rule 60(b) motion because he did not raise it in his first rule 60(b) motion. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Pursuant to Utah Code section 58-37-13 (Supp.1996), the State initiated forfeiture proceedings against Petersen to seize his property located at 736 North Colorado Street, Salt Lake City, UT. The State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. D. Omar Valdez, Worldstar Communications Corp. v. James S. FeltmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Robert SWAIM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOLTAN COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Collins v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Gold Standard, Inc. v. American Barrick Resources Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. GarnerUtah Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Judson v. Wheeler RV Las Vegas, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Cadlerock Joint Venture II, LP v. Envelope Packaging of Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Gillett v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API