Legal Opinion

State v. Lujan

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1968No. 186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 was denied without a hearing; he appeals. Fie was convicted of a narcotics offense in 1960. Flis conviction in 1965 and sentence as a second narcotics offender was affirmed in State v. Lujan, 76 N.M. 111, 412 P.2d 405 (1966). Post-conviction relief was denied in State v. Lujan, 79 N.M. 200, 441 P.2d 497 (1968). Pie now attacks the validity of his sentence as a second offender on three grounds..

1. Defendant asserts the criminal information which charged the second narcotics offense alleged that he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. DalrympleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. LarranagaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SedilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. State v. SlickerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. CochranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. SlickerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. State v. TafoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API