State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
A jury found the defendant guilty of larceny and burglary and he was sentenced pursuant to the Habitual Criminal Statute, '§ 40A-29-5, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.1964). Defendant questions (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction; (2) the admission into evidence of copies of log sheets prepared by the radio dispatcher for the police department; and (3) the ■constitutionality of the Plabitual Criminal Statute.
We affirm.
SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE JURY VERDICT.
On appeal from a conviction we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ZarafonetisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. SharpNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. McCrawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. TrejoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. MosierNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.