State v. Slicker
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Certain items of personal property were admitted into evidence. These items point to defendant as the person who committed the crime. Defendant attempted to suppress this evidence prior to trial and objected to the admission of the items during the trial. Appealing his conviction of aggravated burglary, defendant contends that the evidence should have been excluded because (1) his initial arrest was illegal, (2) seizure of the items was unreasonable, (3) his second arrest was illegal and (4) of alleged procedural defects occurring immediately after his initial arrest.
Two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. DeltenreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. HilliardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. AldereteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.