Legal Opinion
State v. Baldonado
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1968No. 110PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARMIJO, Judge.
Appellant seeks post-conviction relief by his motion filed under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953, which motion was ruled on without a hearing as being a second and successive motion for similar relief. This appeal follows from entry of order.denying the motion.
The issue raised by this motion involves the alleged violation of appellant’s constitutional rights as afforded under that portion of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States which states:
“ * * * nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
We do not discuss…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GuruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. GuruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. McClendonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FollisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.