Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Peterson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1985No. 84-3887PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
753 F.2d 754
22 ERC 1608, 15 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,225
Harold THOMAS, dba Allison Ranch and Cook Ranch, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
R. Max PETERSON, in his official capacity as Chief of the
United States Forest Service, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Inland Forest Resource Council, a Montana corporation, et
al., Defendants/Intervenors-Appellees.
No. 84-3887.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1984.
Decided Feb. 11, 1985.
Michael Axline, Pacific Northwest Resources Clinic, Eugene, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Albert M. Ferlo, Jr., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Hugh…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Metcalf v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.