Legal Opinion
Metcalf v. Daley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2000No. 98-36135PublishedCited by 176 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TROTT; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Jack Metcalf et al. appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees William Daley, Secretary of Commerce; James Baker, Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Rolland A. Schmitten, Director of National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively “Federal Defendants”); and the Makah Indian Tribe (“Makah” or “Tribe”). Appellants argue that in granting the Makah authorization to resume whaling, the Federal Defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Davis v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Save Our Sound OBX, Inc. v. NC Dept of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Center for Biological Diversity v. National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.