Legal Opinion
Conner v. Burford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1988No. Nos. 85-3929 to 85-3937PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether federal agencies violated the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., or the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), 16 U.S.C. *1443§ 1531 et seq., by selling oil and gas leases on 1,300,000 acres of national forest land in Montana without preparing either an environmental impact statement (EIS) or a comprehensive biological opinion encompassing the impact of post-leasing activities on threatened or endangered species. The district court ruled that the sale of the leases without an EIS or a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Metcalf v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.