Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Consolidated Steel Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 30, 1945No. Civ. 3850PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.(1) Action under the Fair Labor Standards Act

This case was tried before the Court sitting without a jury, and thereupon ordered to stand submitted on briefs to be filed, which briefs have been filed and duly considered by the court. The opinion of the Court herein concerns exclusively twenty-one firemen or former firemen, and twenty-seven guards or former guards, of the Consolidated Steel Corporation, Ltd., a corporation, who, as plaintiffs, all members of the American Federation of Labor (known as Guards, Shipyard Firemen, Plant Protection Local Union No.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  5. Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Aubry v. GoldhorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
  4. White v. ArmyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. White v. Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API