Favreau v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a class action brought by former members of the United States Armed Forces who were separated from their respective services1 because they failed to meet weight and/or physical fitness standards. Plaintiffs ■do not challenge their separations but instead challenge the services’ recoupment of bonuses to which they became entitled at the time they agreed to enlist or re-enlist in the services.
There are two causes of action. Count One alleges that the government breached plaintiffs’ enlistment or reenlistment contracts. Count Two alleges that recoupment was an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Favreau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Chapman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Favreau, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002