Legal Opinion

Chapman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 18, 2010No. 09-440CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

DAMICH, Judge.

This is an action on cross motions for judgment on the administrative record,1 pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), regarding decisions of the Coast Guard Board for Correction of Military Records (“BCMR” or “Board”) that upheld the Coast Guard’s 2005 administrative separation of Mr. Chapman for failure to comply with weight and body fat standards.

For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record is granted and Plaintiffs cross-motion is denied.

1.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hwang v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Sieben v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API