Legal Opinion
Kruchten v. Eyman
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 1, 1967No. Civ-6304PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRAIG, District Judge.
In the above entitled cause petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254. All state remedies having been exhausted, the petition for writ of habeas corpus was received.
Petitioner pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Yuma to the crime of first degree murder. An appeal was taken to the Supreme Court of Arizona from the judgment of conviction and the sentence of death. Following a coram nobis hearing, ordered by the Supreme Court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Herman v. ClaudySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Gibbs v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lawrence George Kruchten v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- State v. DeLunaArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. BelcherArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Janovic v. EymanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1967
- Joseph William Janovic, Jr. v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.