Legal Opinion

Lawrence George Kruchten v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1969No. 22706PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRARY, District Judge.

Appellant, Lawrence George Kruchten, appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona dated December 1, 1967, denying appellant’s petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed with the United States District Court, under Title 28, United States Code, Section 2254, Kruchten v. Eyman, 276 F.Supp. 858.

The appellant and his co-defendant, Joseph William Janovic, Jr., pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Yuma, to the crime of first degree murder, and sentence to death was imposed on both…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. People v. BerlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. William Foxworth v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Eugene Mason v. State of Arizona, A. E. Gomes, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison AtflorenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API