Legal Opinion

Janovic v. Eyman

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 1, 1967No. Civ-6305PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRAIG, District Judge.

In the above entitled cause petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It appearing that all state remedies had been exhausted, the petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by this Court.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to the crime of first degree murder in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Yuma. An appeal was taken to the Supreme Court of Arizona from the judgment of conviction and the sentence of death. Following a coram nobis hearing, ordered by the Supreme Court of Arizona to make…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawrence George Kruchten v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Willoughby v. PhendDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
  3. Kruchten v. EymanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1967
  4. People v. ChambersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Gibson v. BolesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API