Legal Opinion
Joseph William Janovic, Jr. v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1969No. 22707_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRARY, District Judge:
The instant appeal is from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona made on December 1, 1967, denying, after hearing, appellant’s petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and is a companion appeal to that of appellant Kruchten, No. 22,706, which was perfected from a similar order of the said United States District Court. Janovic v. Eyman, D.C., 276 F.Supp. 862, and Kruchten v. Eyman, D.C., 276 F.Supp. 858.
The opinion of this Court, affirming the order of the United States District Court denying the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Perez v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Lawrence George Kruchten v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- State v. JanovicArizona Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. VaitogiHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Quillien v. LeekeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- People v. De LeonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974