Legal Opinion

People v. Sisneros

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1997No. B107281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

We are called upon to determine whether the instrument possessed by defendant was a dirk or dagger. The current version of the statute proscribes only instruments “capable of ready use as a stabbing weapon.” (Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (c)(24).) We conclude the device, which requires some degree of assembly to be used as a knife, was not so “capable,” and reverse the conviction.

Background

Police stopped defendant, who was riding his bicycle after dark. The officers meant to write him a ticket for inadequate lighting on the bicycle. One of the officers noticed a knife in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CabralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Bills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. Robert L.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. Quintus W.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. PettwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Medina-AnicacioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. People v. George W.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. OSKINSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. AubreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. Truschke CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API