People v. Pettway
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
We hold that a knife with a handle designed to fit in the palm of the hand, with a two- and one-fourth-inch blade protruding between the middle fingers, is a “dirk or dagger” within the meaning of Penal Code section 12020, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 12020(a)). We disagree with In re Conrad V. (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 775 [222 Cal.Rptr. 552], which held that a similar knife was not a dagger, in part because it did not have a handguard.
Defendant Curtis T. Pettway appeals from the revocation of probation and the imposition of a three-year state prison sentence. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. BainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. CabralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MowattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. SisnerosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- People v. AubreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.