Legal Opinion

People v. Pettway

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1991No. A052481PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

We hold that a knife with a handle designed to fit in the palm of the hand, with a two- and one-fourth-inch blade protruding between the middle fingers, is a “dirk or dagger” within the meaning of Penal Code section 12020, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 12020(a)). We disagree with In re Conrad V. (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 775 [222 Cal.Rptr. 552], which held that a similar knife was not a dagger, in part because it did not have a handguard.

Defendant Curtis T. Pettway appeals from the revocation of probation and the imposition of a three-year state prison sentence. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. CabralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. MowattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. People v. SisnerosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. People v. AubreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API