Legal Opinion
Davis v. Walmart Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 8, 2025No. 6:23-cv-00870Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION GLYNNDA DAVIS, Case No. 6:23-cv-00870-MC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. WALMART #5368 and WALMART INC., Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff Glynnda Davis brings this premises liability action against Defendants Walmart #5368 and Walmart Inc., seeking damages for the injuries she sustained after tripping in Defendants’ parking lot. She now moves to amend her Complaint to adjust the allegations, alter the damages, and add a claim for negligence per se. Pl.’s Mot. 2–3, ECF No. 39. Defendants object only to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Patrick Novak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018