Legal Opinion

Trull v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1898No. Nos. 10,870-(203)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by defendants Stener A. Stenerson and Aleck A. Stenerson from a judgment of the district court for Scott county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Oadwell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

This action was commenced to foreclose a mortgage covering a quarter section of land in Scott-county, in this state. The answer alleges full payment of the note- and mortgage, that plaintiff had executed a written satisfaction thereof, and that the same was duly recorded in the office of the register of deeds in Scott county.

The mortgage bears date May 1, 1886, and was executed by one Ellsworth A. Hammond to the plaintiff, Trull, who then and ever since has resided in the state of Massachusetts. The note which it *173was given to secure bears the same date, and was payable in five years, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Joy v. VanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Trowbridge v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Koen v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Corey v. HunterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Martinson v. KershnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. General Convention of Congregational Ministers & Churches v. TorkelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Budd v. BroenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API