Trowbridge v. Ross
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Clinton. (Daboll, J.) Bill to declare a mortgage paid and to discharge the same. Defendant filed a cross-bill praying for the foreclosure of said mortgage. Defendant Ross appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The original bill was filed in this cause, praying that a certain mortgage given by complainants to Christina Ross, guardian of Robert D. Ross, be declared to be fully paid, and discharged of record, upon the ground that the moneys due thereon had been paid to the Michigan Mortgage Company, Limited, which, .it is •claimed, was authorized to receive such payment for and on behalf of the defendant. To this bill the defendant answered, and filed a cross-bill, in which it is claimed that the Michigan Mortgage Company was not authorized to receive such payment, and that such mortgage still remains…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cheney v. LibbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Joy v. VanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- St. Paul National Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Caldwell v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
3Cited by14 opinions
- Trull v. HammondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Hefferman v. BotelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Wales v. MowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Kohl v. BeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Morley v. University of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.