Legal Opinion
William J. Walker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1987No. 86-2337PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Per curiam
Walker, an inmate at the federal penitentiary at Lompoc, California, appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. Walker’s suit challenged a decision of the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) setting a presumptive parole date. The panel unanimously votes to have the case submitted without oral argument. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Walker pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1982). A second count of armed bank robbery was dismissed. On September 26, 1983, the district court sentenced Walker to a twenty-year term…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roberts v. CorrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Park Hung QuanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ramee Jamal Shah, Aka: Eddie Harris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Martin Allen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Anthony Dwayne AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.