Legal Opinion

Novak v. Fay

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2015No. B256889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Mark S. Novak, seeks to enforce an attorney fee lien on assets held by the Dana Teitler Trust dated August 20, 1999 (Dana Teitler Trust). The present petition to enforce the attorney fee lien arises out of plaintiff’s representation of Douglas Kelly between 2007 and 2012. In 2007, plaintiff and Mr. Kelly executed a contingency attorney fee agreement. The contingency fee agreement granted plaintiff lien rights over any settlement Mr. Kelly received. Under the terms of the fee agreement, plaintiff was to represent Mr. Kelly. In 2011, plaintiff…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belcher v. Bakkers CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API