Commonwealth v. Barndt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
Michael Barndt (“Appellant”), appearing pro se, challenges the trial court’s order denying relief under the Post-Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. We reverse.
Appellant, as well as his girlfriend, Tonia Fucci, and his son, Michael Barndt, Jr., were arrested on May 28, 2010, for possession with intent to deliver (“PWID”) 65.2 grams of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia.1 Appellant retained private counsel, Philip D. Lauer, Esquire, to represent him. The weight of the contraband and Appellant’s prior criminal record exposed him to the prospect…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by448 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FurgessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. LippertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. KelleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HerediaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. of Pa. v. PierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
443 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.