Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barndt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 2013PublishedCited by 448 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

Michael Barndt (“Appellant”), appearing pro se, challenges the trial court’s order denying relief under the Post-Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. We reverse.

Appellant, as well as his girlfriend, Tonia Fucci, and his son, Michael Barndt, Jr., were arrested on May 28, 2010, for possession with intent to deliver (“PWID”) 65.2 grams of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia.1 Appellant retained private counsel, Philip D. Lauer, Esquire, to represent him. The weight of the contraband and Appellant’s prior criminal record exposed him to the prospect…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by448 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FurgessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. LippertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. KelleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. HerediaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. of Pa. v. PierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

443 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API