Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lesko

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2011No. 518 CAP, 519 CAP, 520 CAPPublishedCited by 311 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.*

In these consolidated capital post-conviction cross-appeals, the Commonwealth challenges the August 7, 2006 order of the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas awarding John C. Lesko a new trial and penalty hearing under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. In his protective cross-appeal, Lesko challenges the portions of the PCRA court’s ruling which denied certain claims for relief. The appeals of the PCRA court’s order are directly reviewable by this Court pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9546(d). For the reasons that follow, we reverse…

2Cases cited127 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by311 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. Treiber, S., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API