Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Cahill

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Montrose County.

1Opinion of the Court 1

ON REHEARING.

2Opinion of the Court · ThomsonThomson, J.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for injuries to stock in its charge, *160occasioned by its negligence, and that of its agents and employés. The complaint alleges that on the 18th day of July, 1890, the defendant received from the plaintiff, for shipment over its road, three stallions, at Pueblo, Colorado; and that while they were in its charge and loaded upon its cars at Pueblo, they received severe injuries by reason of the willful and grossly negligent acts of the company, its agents and employés; and that one of them was so hurt…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fletcher & Gerelds v. StowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Smith v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Reavis v. CowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pearse v. BordeleauColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Kannaugh v. Quartette Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. CrumpColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Carlson v. RensinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. King v. MilnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  4. Jamieson House Furnishing Co. v. BrainardColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. CrumpColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API