Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Rensink

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1918No. 9033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. Haslett P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged fraud and deceit of Oscar H. Carlson, one of the defendants, in a transaction involving an exchange of ranch property owned by him, for Denver city property, owned by William and Johanna Rensink, plaintiffs, and for the cancellation of a note and trust deed for $500.00 in favor of defendant Huida M. Carlson, Oscar’s wife, given in the exchange of properties. That note was, after maturity, transferred to the other defendant, Anderson. The jury returned special findings to the effect that defendant Carlson showed plaintiffs other and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Mullen v. McKimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. CahillColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denver Air Center v. District Court for the Twentieth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Slattery v. Iowa District Court for Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Robbins v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API