Legal Opinion
King v. Milner
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 15, 1917No. 8670PublishedCited by 2 opinions
ErrÚr to Routt District Court, Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Allen J.
The original complaint of the plaintiff contained two counts. The first count, in substance, alleged that the de*406fendant “did seize or cause to be seized” the plaintiff in Moffat county, and conveyed to and imprisoned in Routt county, all without right or authority so to do. The second count sets up a cause of action for malicious prosecution.
The defendant filed a demurrer to the original complaint. The court sustained the demurrer as to several of its grounds, and subsequently ordered “that the said plaintiff have time arid until 20 days from the date hereof in which to amend his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolf v. PerrymanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Watkins v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Holt County v. CannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Givens v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Rockwell v. HolcombColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Westesen v. Olathe State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Quincy Showcase Works v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927