Legal Opinion

Reavis v. Cowell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,297PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial, in the Second District Court, County of Butte. Hundley, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

This action was commenced in the District Court of the Second Judicial District, in and for the county of Butte, and the *589defendant, being a resident of the county of Santa Cruz, filed his motion and affidavit to have the case transferred to the county in'which he resided, for trial. The motion was opposed by the plaintiff, on the ground that the convenience of witnesses would be subserved by retaining the cause in the county of Butte. The defendant thereupon filed another affidavit, contradicting the affidavit of the plaintiff, and tending to show that the convenience of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Hanchett v. FinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Selden v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Hall v. Cent. Pac. R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Meldrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. Ormsby v. OttmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Calhoun County Bank v. EllisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Scott v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Cty. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. JackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API