Bloemendal v. Albrecht
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action commenced before a justice of the peace in Renville county to recover $90, and interest, damages for conversion of crops. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appealed to the district court for that county, and the action was removed to the district court for Sibley county, where it was tried before Cadwell, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $94.40. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Plaintiffs Bloemendal were in possession of certain premises in the spring of 1898, then and for many years having resided thereon. On May 5 of that year they rented a part of the premises to plaintiff Quade, who planted a crop thereon. At the trial it was stipulated that on October 16, 1898, a writ of restitution had issued out of the district court of Renville county upon a judgment in an action wherein defendant, Albrecht, was plaintiff, and plaintiffs Bloemendal were defendants, which judgment had decreed Albrecht to have been the owner of and entitled to the possession of the premises…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First National Bank v. St. Croix Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- State Bank of Loretto v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Crain v. BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Gunderson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926