Legal Opinion

Gunderson v. Hoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1926No. 25,352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The action is in replevin for a crop of rye sown on a certain farm in the fall of 1923 and harvested in 1924. The court found “that plaintiff has failed to show that his intestate, Halvor Gunderson, was the owner of said rye.” The appeal is from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

This action was begun in the fall of 1924. An action had also been brought in February of that year by the plaintiff herein against the defendant Hoff and his landlord, G. H. Stavens, to recover possession of the farm on which the rye in question was growing. In his answer therein Stavens alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Goodwin v. CloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Ferman v. Lombard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Strand v. BollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API