Legal Opinion
Krall v. Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 1, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-6732PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATZ, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 1995, upon consideration of plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, and the defendant’s response thereto, and after a hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the said Motion is DENIED.
A petitioner seeking injunctive relief must demonstrate both a likelihood of success on the merits and a probability of irreparable harm. Bradley v. Pittsburgh Bd. of Educ., 910 F.2d 1172, 1175 (3d Cir.1990). Additionally, the public interest must be considered. Id.
Background
On February 13, 1995, Krall…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Smith v. County Court of Essex CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DrakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Schwartz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (In Re Kridlow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.