Legal Opinion

Jeffords v. Florence County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1932No. 13347PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

February 10, 1932. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This case bristles with sharp contradictions. The action is brought to recover damages for injuries to his person and damages to his property, which plaintiff alleges he suffered under the following circumstances: It appears from the complaint that the authorities of Florence undertook, in the summer of 1930, the work of widening a portion of the highway in that county leading from the Timmonsville-Darlington highway to Ebenezer; that in this work the county authorities constructed a ditch which ran halfway across the road; that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Cirsosky v. SmathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Hammond v. SchiffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Cooper v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Farley v. Charleston Basket & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Powers v. TempleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Seay v. Southern Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Regent Cooperative Equity Exchange v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Powell v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Estate of Rattenni Ex Rel. Rattenni v. GraingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API