Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Barry

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

Cope, J. and Norton, J. concurring.

This is an action of ejectment for the recovery of certain real estate situated in the city of San Francisco. The premises constitute a portion of the municipal lands of the old pueblo. The plaintiffs rely upon the prior possession in 1849 and 1850 of one Thomas White, through whom they claim. The defendant rests his defense upon a grant issued by a Justice of the Peace of San Francisco, by the name of Colton, in December, 1849, and the alleged operation in his favor of the Van Ness Ordinance.

On the trial it was admitted, that in October, 1849, White, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Bequette v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Carleton v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Hart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Baird v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Hicks v. SteiglemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API