Ryals v. City of Englewood
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
delivered the Oplmon of the Court.
{ 1 We accepted jurisdiction over this certified question of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cireuit,. See CAR, 21.1. The Tenth Cireuit has asked us whether the City of Englewood's Ordinance 84, which effectively bars certain sex offenders from residing within the city, is preempted by Colorado law. 560 Fed.Appx. 726 (10th Cir.2014) (unpublished order), ~As a preliminary matter, we conclude that because both state and local governments bave an interest in governing the matter of sex offender residency, the ordinance concerns an issue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ray v. DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Vela v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- City of Commerce City v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- City of Northglenn v. IbarraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Millard v. RankinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
- City of Longmont Colorado v. Colorado Oil & Gas Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- City of Fort Collins v. Colorado Oil & Gas Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.