Legal Opinion

Andrews & Lawrence v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 28, 2020No. 5/19PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews & Lawrence Professional Services, LLC and Galyn Manor Homeowners Association, Inc. v. David O. Mills, et ux., No. 5, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT – DEBT COLLECTION ACTIVITY BY LAWYER. In the context of debt collection activity, not all services provided by a lawyer or a law firm fall within the “professional services” exemption under the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), Maryland Code Commercial Law Article (“CL”), § 13-104(1). Specifically, where: (1) the lawyer’s services could be provided by any licensed debt collection agency without regard to…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ashly Alexander v. Carrington Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Chavis v. Blibaum & Assoc. Moore v. Peak Mgmt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Mayor & Cncl. of Balt. v. Thornton MellonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. State v. KrikstanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Chavis v. Blibaum Assoc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API