Legal Opinion
Lockshin v. Semsker
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 12, 2010No. 78 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 230 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
The Circuit Court for Montgomery County held in this litigation, among other things, that the plain meaning of Md.Code, Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article 1 § 3-2A- 09(a) (1974, 2006 RepLVol), which states that the monetary cap on non-economic damages for health care malpractice claims appearing in § 8-2A-09(b) applies “to an award under § 3-2A-05 of this subtitle or a verdict under § 3-2A-06 of this subtitle,” is that the cap is inapplicable to claims for which arbitration is waived pursuant to §§ 3-2A-06A or 3-2A-06B. The latter provisions provide the procedures for mutual…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- BOARD OF ED. OF BALTIMORE CTY. v. Zimmer-RubertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Koste v. Town of OxfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State v. BeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Lewis v. WaletzkyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.