State v. Krikstan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Keith Krikstan, No. 18, September Term, 2022 CHILD ABUSE – SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR – ACT THAT INVOLVES SEXUAL EXPLOITATION – SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – Supreme Court of Maryland* held that evidence was sufficient to support substitute teacher’s conviction for child sexual abuse based on teacher’s in-school discussion with minor about teacher’s anger or jealousy over minor’s affection for another adult man amidst teacher’s ongoing sexual exploitation of minor outside of school, via electronic and telephone communications. Teacher’s in-school discussion with minor of his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- United States v. Shawn EngleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re: M.P.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Turenne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Covington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Coyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.