Legal Opinion

Preston v. Poe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1911PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Co-urt of Baltimore City (Heuis-Eer, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

' -The appellant is a stockholder of the United Surety Company, a corporation of this State. On December 24th, 1910, he filed a bill in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City for the dissolution of the company and the appointment of receivers to take charge of its assets, convert them into money and make distribution among those entitled. This action was sought on the ground that the business of the company was being conducted at a loss and that it was insolvent. An order was passed requiring the defendant corporation to show cause within a stated time why receivers should not be appointed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Lurman v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Hall v. JackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  5. Withers v. DenmeadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Matter of AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Lickle v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Brashears v. LindenbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. In Re Buckler TrustsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API