Legal Opinion

Sloniger v. Rains

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 15, 1949No. 16,157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiffs, being unsuccessful there, here seek reversal of an adverse judgment which was based upon the pleadings without the introduction of any evidence. The following statement made by the court preceding the entry of its judgment sets forth”the pertinent facts:

“Plaintiffs allege they are owners as joint tenants of real property and that defendants claim some right or interest in the property adversely to plaintiffs. They pray a decree that defendants have no right or interest in the property, and that they be adjudged to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pomponio v. LarsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Bijou Irrigation District v. Weldon Valley Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Fort v. BietschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Cox v. GodecSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Beman v. Rocky Ford National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Westminster v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. White v. WidgerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. D. A. C. Uranium Co. v. BentonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
  5. Schuler v. OldervikColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API