Legal Opinion

White v. Widger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 12, 1960No. 18632PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Doyle.

The parties are referred to as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiff in error White was plaintiff and Widger was defendant. White instituted a forcible entry and detainer action in which he sought to regain possession of a 160-acre tract of farm property which had been sold to Widger on an installment contract.

Defendant first went into possession of the land in October of 1940 under a vendor-purchaser installment contract dated September 5, 1940, wherein plaintiff agreed to sell the farm for a total purchase price of $8,000 in installments as follows:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Hurt v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Loveland Camp No. 83 v. Woodmen Building & Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. Duncan v. Colorado Investment & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sleeping Indian Ranch, Inc. v. West Ridge Group, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Schuler v. OldervikColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Carreathers v. CarreathersColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Sleeping Indian Ranch, Inc. v. West Ridge Group, L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Albert J. Lilygren, J. G. Ortengren, and Cellular Concrete Products of Colorado, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API