Fort v. Bietsch
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
Bietsch brought an action in tort against Fort before a justice of the peace, and recovered judgment for damages in the sum of two hundred dollars. Fort appealed to the county court, where judgment in a like amount was again awarded against him. He brings the case here on writ of error and asks for a supersedeas. Both parties ask for a final determination on such application. The parties will he designated as at the trial, Bietsch as. plaintiff and Fort as defendant.
Defendant owns a reservoir for irrigating purposes, constructed across Todd creek. The reservoir dam is composed of earth. Todd…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Fowle v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Peacock v. Sundre TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Hudson v. Western Oil Fields, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.