Legal Opinion

Fort v. Bietsch

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 28, 1929No. 12,119PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Bietsch brought an action in tort against Fort before a justice of the peace, and recovered judgment for damages in the sum of two hundred dollars. Fort appealed to the county court, where judgment in a like amount was again awarded against him. He brings the case here on writ of error and asks for a supersedeas. Both parties ask for a final determination on such application. The parties will he designated as at the trial, Bietsch as. plaintiff and Fort as defendant.

Defendant owns a reservoir for irrigating purposes, constructed across Todd creek. The reservoir dam is composed of earth. Todd…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Fowle v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Peacock v. Sundre TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Hudson v. Western Oil Fields, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API