Legal Opinion
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Petersen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1935No. 1232PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
On January 2, 1931, Woolworth Company and Petersen entered into an employment contract whereby Petersen was to act as a superintendent of the Company at any general managing office of the Company designated by it.
The contract in part read as follows:
“First. That the party of the second part agrees faithfully and diligently to work as Superintendent for the said party of the first part for a term of one year from the first day of January, 1931, and continue from year to year unless written notice to cancel is given by either party to the other prior to December 1st of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Rushing v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Odell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- University City, Mo. v. Home Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.