Legal Opinion

Fruen v. Fruen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1949No. 34,886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant were divorced under the laws of Minnesota in March 1946. After the pleadings in that action were joined, the parties entered into a stipulation concerning certain provisions which the decree should contain, if the court deemed it proper, in the event the divorce was granted. The provisions of this stipulation, so far as pertinent here, were incorporated into the court’s decree as follows:

“That plaintiff be awarded the permanent care and custody of David Arthur Fruen, aged five years, and Michael Barrett Fruen, aged two years, subject to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Zilley v. DunwiddieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. In re the Final Account of BesondySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. State v. LangfordOregon Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Marriage of Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Krusemark v. KrusemarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API