Legal Opinion
State v. Mayer
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 2004No. 29030PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Chief Judge.
Farron Rusty Mayer pleaded guilty to battery with the intent to commit rape. Before he was sentenced, but after he had been informed of the State’s sentencing recommendation, he moved for dismissal of the charge and for withdrawal of his guilty plea. These motions were based principally on the contentions that the information did not allege, and Mayer had not understood when pleading guilty, that intent to commit rape required an intent to sexually penetrate the victim. The district court denied both motions, and Mayer appeals. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CroweTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ArthurIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. McNairIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. MurrayIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Nancy M. HartsockIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.