Legal Opinion

State v. Nancy M. Hartsock

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 2016No. Docket 43342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMelanson, Chief Judge

Nancy M. Hartsock appeals from her judgment of conviction following her plea of guilty to drawing checks without funds. Specifically, Hartsock argues that the district court abused its discretion when it denied Hartsock’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Hartsock entered an Alford 1 plea to drawing checks without funds. I.C. § 19-2601. In exchange for Hartsock’s plea, the state agreed to dismiss additional charges. The state agreed to recommend a unified sentence of three years, with a minimum term of confinement of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. FreemanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. BallardIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. DoppIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SunseriIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. BaxterIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. SalinasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API