Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Franklin. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Talbot.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Appellee sues to recover damages for injuries to his wife resulting from a miscarriage which he alleges was caused by fright from the near approach of a passing train at a public crossing. The circumstances of the case may be best shown by stating from the testimony of plaintiff. He testified that he had his family in a wagon, driving along the public road, and stopped about thirty or forty yards from the crossing, and looked and listened for any approaching train, and saw and heard none. That where he stopped was on the brink of a hill, and from there down to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HayterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TrottTexas Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Houston Electric Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sutton Motor Company v. CryselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Davidson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Downing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Wedgworth v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API